"President Obama and the Senate have confirmed Justice Sonia Sotomayor and Justice Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court. Gun owners, organizations like the NRA (National Rifle Association), and GOA (Gun Owners of America) were alarmed by these appointments and confirmations. The question is should they have been alarmed? Should any Sovereign American Citizen with Natural Rights be alarmed when a member of the legal BAR (British Accredited Registry) is confirmed to the Supreme Court? It does not seem to alarm us when Democrat and Republican attorneys of the BAR (British Accredited Registry) hold most of the positions in government, so what's the big deal surrounding who is nominated to the Supreme Court?
Allow me to explain why we should ALL be worried about the current legal system, which was implemented by Democrat and Republican members of the BAR in Congress. After the founding of our nation, the American people were supreme and sovereign. Fast forward a few hundred years; it is the attorneys in the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government who appear supreme and sovereign. I don't know how you view these turn of events, but this ""change"" in sovereign status from ""We the people"" to ""Them the government"" does not seem good for America. Perhaps it is time we begin worrying about who sits on the Supreme Court and why they were placed there in the first place. Perhaps it is time the American people were supreme and sovereign again in the United States.
Mainstream Media and most government agents have convinced Americans the Supreme Court can ""change"" the Constitution by interpreting what it says to meet the needs of Special Interest groups and corporations. The Supreme Court cannot lawfully interpret the Constitution, but the ""perception"" they have the power to interpret the Constitution is why the NRA and GOA were alarmed when anti-Second Amendment Justices Sotomayor and Kagan were confirmed to the Supreme Court. In the United States legal Democracy, everything hinges on perception. That's why, in their legal Democracy, ""Truth is the perception of the Majority."" If governmental leaders still used the lawful Republic of the Founding Fathers, there would be no need for alarm when government agents take office. On the other hand, since we agreed to use the ""legal"" system created by the attorneys in the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government, our freedom and liberty depend on uncovering the truth about the Supreme Court. Allow me to provide evidence of this all-important truth relating to the Supreme Court as well as our governments in general.
The power of the Supreme Court can be found in Article III Section 2 of the Constitution. It reads, ""The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority."" Article III Section 2 of the Constitution additional says, ""the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make."" The Founding Fathers did a good job separating the powers of government. What some of the Founding Fathers ""possibly"" failed to foresee is the separation of powers does not work when most governmental representatives in Congress and all Supreme Court Justices belong to the elite organization called the British Accredited Registry (BAR). Members of the BAR in the Supreme Court having the ""judicial Power"", and other members of the BAR in Congress having the ability to create ""Exceptions, and such Regulations"" to everything else could leave the American people with no ""lawful Justice"". Evidence and the state of our nation suggest Lady Liberty has been fed a lethal dose of ""legal Justice"" as America is controlled by members of the British Accredited Registry (BAR) at all levels of government...instead of controlled by the American people.
In his book, The Constitution That Never Was, Ralph Boryzewski points out the following (emphasis mine):
""The founding lawyers...had repeatedly seen juries refuse to convict their fellow citizens who were caught smuggling contraband goods to avoid paying the duties required by English law. The jury defied the supreme authority, the King of England. However, under their new constitutional system, the lawyers intended to put an end to such powers.
...They would continue to get themselves elected to the Congress...where they would enact the laws. They would continue as in England with Attorneys General and Districts Attorney to enforce the laws, and finally only lawyers could be judges who would interpret the law. With the power of the three departments in their hands, the lawyers could make themselves sovereign authority with better control over the people than the King himself.""
It appears Special Interest lawyers and attorneys have made themselves sovereign authority in the United States, ""with better control over the people than the King himself."" Because ""juries refuse to convict their fellow citizens"", we now have commercial ""Equity Law"" courts containing only Judges of the British Accredited Registry (BAR) with no ""Common Law"" jury present in court. Lack of a jury in court is a disturbing situation, but it might not be as bad as it seems. You see, the Special Interest controlled lawyers and attorneys in government and the Supreme Court have ""better control over the people than the King himself"" in their legal system using ""legal Justice"". Fortunately for the American people, our Natural Rights from God, the Universe, and Nature fall under the realm of ""lawful Justice"", which is outside the jurisdiction of Congress and the Supreme Court. Unfortunately for the American people, we have allowed Mainstream Media, government-controlled schools, and lying politicians with BAR cards to convince us our Natural Rights fall within their legal system. Please be aware there is a difference between the lawyers' and attorneys' legal system of equity used today and the Founding Fathers' lawful system of common law put in place when America was created. I won't go into the difference between legal laws and lawful laws within this article; I've written extensively on these issues in my book and Blog already.
The Constitution was written FOR governmental employees to follow when running the ""government"" of the United States of America, not FOR governmental employees to control the American people. It was not meant to be a document giving governmental employees ""better control over the people than the King himself"". Sadly, we've been brainwashed to believe it puts government over the people-especially when the Supreme Court is involved. Most of us have this erroneous belief because Mainstream Media and the attorneys in government want us to believe employees with British Accredited Registry (BAR) licenses control America...as they use the Supreme Court as the final RULING body. Look at all the Media hoopla when a new Supreme Court Justice is confirmed by Congress. I watched the beginning of C-SPAN's coverage of Supreme Court Senate confirmation hearings for Ms. Kagan with much amusement. One of my NOT so favorite Senators, Dianne Feinstein, said, ""the most powerful computer cannot tell us whether the Presidents power as commander in chief allows him to exceed the bounds of the Foreign Intelligence Act and other statutes in wartime; nor can they tell us congressional laws barring guns from the grounds of schools or implementing new Health Insurance requirements are within Congresses Article I powers."" Senator Feinstein is correct when she says computers can't decide these ""legal issues"". However, evidence suggests these ""lawful issues"" have already been decided in the Founding Fathers' Constitution. Feinstein wants you to believe the Supreme Court can lawfully RULE on ""congressional laws barring guns"" and Congress ""implementing new Health Insurance requirements are within Congresses Article I powers.""
Senator Feinstein is incorrect when she makes such legal, yet unconstitutional, allegations. Article I of the Constitution does not allow congressional laws barring guns; nor does it give government employees the power to force FREE Sovereign American Citizens to do anything that would violate our Natural Rights. Article I of the Constitution defines the powers of Federal Government to run the nation. It does not give government the power to violate our Natural Rights to be armed or force Americans to purchase government-controlled Health Insurance. That's why the attorneys in Congress need the attorneys in the Supreme Court to RULE in the government's favor when these issues are challenged in court.
As you can see, members of Congress wish to convince us the Supreme Court has ""better control over the people than the King himself"". Ralph Boryzewski was correct when he said, ""With the power of the three departments in their hands, the lawyers could make themselves sovereign authority."" Evidence suggests the Special Interest lawyers and attorneys have made themselves RULERS of America, but it's only a legal trick. For example, the Supreme Court knew it could not lawfully interpret the meaning of the lawful Second Amendment in the District of Columbia versus Heller and McDonald versus Chicago gun-control cases, so they gave us a legal interpretation instead. In the Senate confirmation hearing for Kagan, Senator Feinstein attempted to convince everyone watching the Supreme Court had the power to interpret the Constitution. She was very upset the current Supreme Court went against more than 70 years of anti-Second Amendment legal precedent in the District of Columbia versus Heller and McDonald versus Chicago gun-control cases. Feinstein didn't seem to care more than 70 years of anti-Second Amendment legal precedent to disarm Americans and cement ultimate control of the people violated your Natural Rights. Ultimate control of the people today is ""better control over the people than the King himself"" in the past because Americans owned guns to protect themselves from ""the King himself"" in the past. Senators like Feinstein would have the American people defenseless and helpless against their current legal government. That's why Feinstein wanted the Supreme Court to make the final RULE on gun-control, to disarm American Citizens, in the District of Columbia versus Heller and McDonald versus Chicago legal, yet unconstitutional, gun-control cases.
When dealing with the legal system, we must be aware none of the legal statutes passed by attorneys in government can violate our Natural Rights from God or override the Supreme Laws of the Land in the Founding Fathers' Constitution. Statutes violating our Natural Rights are unconstitutional, which means most legal laws legislated by government today are actually unconstitutional statutes. Why were most Gun owners, organizations like the NRA (National Rifle Association), and GOA (Gun Owners of America) alarmed by the appointments and confirmations of anti-Second Amendment Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court? They were alarmed because the lawyers working for the NRA and GOA went to the same law schools as the political attorneys attempting to RULE ""We the People"". Our current legal system of mostly unconstitutional statutes is the only game in town for lawyers and attorneys with BAR card licenses. These legal tricks have been implemented slowly over hundreds of years by certain elements within our government. The same government-controlled school curriculum teaching you government employees and Supreme Court Justices were sovereign over the people is brainwashed into lawyers and attorneys as well when they attend law school.
When lawyers and attorneys pass the BAR (British Accredited Registry) test and get their BAR license, the legal brainwash is complete. Most lawyers and attorneys in government no longer consider Americans possess lawful Natural Rights from God; these political attorneys in Federal, State, and Local government bestow us with man-made Civil Rights instead. If you have Civil Rights instead of Natural Rights, then the attorneys in the Supreme Court feel justified when they interpret the Constitution and RULE America from on high. Civil Rights can be RULED upon within the attorney's fictional realm, which was created by years of legal precedent setting court cases designed to give sovereignty to government while taking sovereignty from American Citizens. It's all a legal trick, but it works because lying politicians, the Mainstream Media, and government-controlled schools have conspired to hide the truth.
Congressional employees, like Senator Feinstein, wish you to believe the Kings and Queens sitting on the Supreme Court have the authority to decide all matters in controversy in the United States. The Special Interest controlled attorneys in Congress, like Senator Feinstein, want you to think the Supreme Court can interpret away the Second Amendment or any other Amendment in the Constitution. Do you believe the Founding Fathers would revolt against ""the King"" of Britain and later turn over control of America to attorneys of the Supreme Court with British Accredited Registry (BAR) card licenses from Britain? Most people think a person has to be a member of the British Accredited Registry (BAR) to sit on the Supreme Court. Of course, this is not the truth. Lawfully, normal American Citizens could become Supreme Court Justices, but don't hold your breath waiting for the attorneys in the Senate to approve your confirmation if you don't have a British Accredited Registry (BAR) license to RULE America using the legal mumbo jumbo that has replaced lawful law.
Can the Supreme Court interpret the Constitution and RULE on any issue? No way, the Supreme Court cannot lawfully interpret the Constitution; that would violate your Natural Rights and make the Supreme Court Kings and Queens of America. Still, there seems to be a real conspiracy afoot with lawyers and attorneys in government. Their plan to, ""continue to get themselves elected to the Congress...where they would enact the laws. They would continue as in England with Attorneys General and Districts Attorney to enforce the laws, and finally only lawyers could be judges who would interpret the law"" is being used to control our nation. I urge my readers to do your research. Look into the oaths of office sworn to by ALL members of government at the Federal and State levels-including the Supreme Court. This information can be found on the Supreme Court website. All our governmental agents swear an oath to uphold the legal Constitution of the United States of America, which is a different document than the Founding Fathers' lawful Constitution for the United States of America. This is yet another legal trick with Constitutions brought to us by most members of Congress, most Presidents, and most Supreme Courts over the last 100 plus years. These legal tricks were not designed to keep us safe; they were designed to take away our freedoms.
Evidence suggests Special Interest lawyers and attorneys have had much success making themselves the sovereign authority in the United States, ""with better control over the people than the King himself."" Members of the British Accredited Registry in Federal, State, and Local governments unconstitutionally control America using their legal system. If that's not horrific enough, Special Interest has the Supreme Court waiting in the wings to make a final RULING on our freedoms. The Founding Fathers did not create America to be RULED by nine Kings and Queens in the Supreme Court with British Accredited Registry (BAR) card licenses. The question is, now that you know the American people are the real Sovereign Kings and Queens of America, will you allow Special Interest attorneys and lawyers of the British Accredited Registry (BAR) to RULE America with legal laws that violate your lawful Natural Rights under God and the Universe? Allowing attorneys in government and Justices in the Supreme Court to keep their fictitious legal supremacy is leading the United States of America down the road to a form of legal slavery for its Citizens. The road to freedom demands the American people become supreme once more in America. Which road will you take now that you know the truth?"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment